GEORGIA-PACIFIC CONSUMER PRODUCTS LP; FORT JAMES CORPORATION; GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC v. NCR CORPORATION; WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY; INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY - Articles

All Content

GEORGIA-PACIFIC CONSUMER PRODUCTS LP; FORT JAMES CORPORATION; GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC v. NCR CORPORATION; WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY; INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY

Posted by: Karen Belcher on Jul 14, 2022

Court: 6th Circuit Court (Published Opinions)

Attorneys 1: ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: Michael R. Shebelskie, Douglas M. Garrou, George P. Sibley, III, J. Pierce Lamberson, HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP, Richmond, Virginia, Peter A. Smit, VARNUM LLP, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Georgia-Pacific Appellees.

Attorneys 2: ON RESPONSE: Mark W. Schneider, Kathleen M. O’Sullivan, Margaret C. Hupp, PERKINS COIE LLP, Seattle, Washington, Scott M. Watson, WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD LLP, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellee Weyerhaeuser Company.

Attorneys 3: ON RESPONSE: John D. Parker, BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP, Cleveland, Ohio, Ryan D. Fischbach, BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP, Los Angeles, California, John F. Cermak, Jr., Sonja A. Inglin, CERMAK & INGLIN LLP, Los Angeles, California, David W. Centner, CLARK HILL PLC, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellant International Paper Company.

Judge(s): MOORE, KETHLEDGE, and DONALD, Circuit Judges

Court Appealed: United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids

The court received a petition for rehearing en banc. The original panel has reviewed the petition for rehearing, has addressed the issues therein in an Appendix to the original panel opinion, and has concluded that rehearing is unnecessary. Upon circulation of the petition and the Appendix to the full court, no judge has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

Therefore, the petition is denied.

Attachments: