STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMIE L. TICE - Articles

All Content

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMIE L. TICE

Posted by: Karen Belcher on Jul 18, 2022

Court: TN Court of Criminal Appeals

Attorneys 1: Benjamin K. Raybin, Nashville, Tennessee (on appeal); and John D. Pellegrin, Gallatin, Tennessee (at trial), for the Appellant, Jamie Leigh Tice.

Attorneys 2: Herbert H. Slatery III, Attorney General and Reporter; Samantha L. Simpson, Assistant Attorney General; Ray Whitley, District Attorney General; and Tara Wyllie and C. Ronald Blanton, Assistant District Attorneys General, for the Appellee, State of Tennessee.

Judge(s): MCMULLEN

A Sumner County jury convicted the Defendant, Jamie L. Tice, of two counts of statutory rape by an authority figure and three counts of aggravated statutory rape, for which the trial court imposed an effective sentence of twenty-four years with release eligibility after service of thirty percent of the sentence in confinement. On appeal, the Defendant argues (1) the evidence is insufficient to sustain her two convictions for statutory rape by an authority figure; (2) the State committed a Brady violation by failing to disclose payments made to a testifying witness and her husband; (3) the trial court erred in failing to provide a modified unanimity instruction in Count 4, and the evidence is insufficient to sustain her conviction for aggravated statutory rape in that count; (4) the trial court committed plain error in improperly admitting hearsay statements of the Defendant’s husband, as well as the argument thereof, which violated the Defendant’s right to due process and confrontation; (5) the trial court erroneously deprived her of the right of cross-examination on certain topics; (6) the trial court imposed an excessive sentence; and (7) cumulative error deprived her of a fair trial. After review, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.

Attachments: