CYNTHIA HURST, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS PERSELL v. CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC. - Articles

All Content

CYNTHIA HURST, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS PERSELL v. CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC.

Posted by: Karen Belcher on Aug 10, 2022

Court: 6th Circuit Court (Published Opinions)

Attorneys 1: ARGUED: Andrew J. Gerling, DOUCET GERLING, CO., L.P.A., Dublin, Ohio, for Appellant.

Attorneys 2: ARGUED: Robert C. Folland, BARNES & THORNBURG LLP, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.

Attorneys 3: ON BRIEF: Andrew J. Gerling, DOUCET GERLING, CO., L.P.A., Dublin, Ohio, for Appellant.

Attorneys 4: ON BRIEF: Robert C. Folland, BARNES & THORNBURG LLP, Columbus, Ohio, Kian J. Hudson, BARNES & THORNBURG LLP, Indianapolis, Indiana, for Appellee.

Judge(s): COLE, CLAY, and THAPAR, Circuit Judges

Court Appealed: United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio at Akron

COLE, Circuit Judge. Cynthia Hurst sued Caliber Home Loans for procedural violations related to her loan-modification application. After both parties filed motions for summary judgment, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Caliber. Hurst appeals the district court’s ruling as to her dual-tracking claim, her reasonable diligence claim, and her adequate notice claim. We conclude that the district court erred with respect to the reasonable diligence claim only, so we affirm in part and vacate in part the district court’s decision.

Attachments: