BRAD COEN V. MYRA (COEN) HORAN - Articles

All Content

BRAD COEN V. MYRA (COEN) HORAN

Posted by: Tanja Trezise on Feb 24, 2023

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1: Myra Horan (Coen), Aiken, South Carolina, pro se appellant.

Judge(s): CLEMENT

The mother of the parties’ only child filed a pro se appeal of the trial court’s order granting the father’s Petition to Allow Relocation and for Modification of the Parties’ Permanent Parenting Plan. The final order was entered on January 25, 2019, and the mother filed a timely Notice of Appeal; however, the technical record was not filed with this court until three years later, on June 7, 2022. While the mother’s pro se appellate brief was timely filed, her brief is profoundly deficient for it fails to comply with Rule 27(a) of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure and Rule 6 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals of Tennessee in many material respects. Specifically, her Statement of the Case and Statement of Facts are littered with a series of assertions unrelated to the merits of this appeal, and she fails to provide the requisite citations to the record as required by Rule 27(a)(6) of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure. Further, her brief fails to set forth relevant arguments with respect to the issues presented as required by Rule 27(a) of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure, and the few citations to legal authorities she provides are not on point. Based on her failure to comply with Rule 27(a)(7) of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure and Rule 6 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Mother has waived her right to an appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

Attachments: