IN RE: FORD MOTOR COMPANY F-150 AND RANGER TRUCK FUEL ECONOMY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION | MARSHALL B. LLOYD; TRACEY TRAVIS; DUSTIN DAWSON AND RICK SHAWLEY; MICHAEL SMITH; EVAN ALLEN; AL BALLS; BRIAN LEJA; STEPHEN MATTSON; JOHN SAUTTER; RANDY TRANSUE; RICK SHURTLIFF; RONALD J. DISMUKES; JEFFERY FOSHEE; ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION; STEVE BEAVERS; DAVID BREWER; RYAN COMBS; VICTOR PEREZ; HAROLD BROWER; KYLE MANNION; NICHOLAS LEONARDI; DEAN KRINER; JAMES WILLIAMS; MATTHEW COMBS; DUSTIN WALDEN; STEVEN HULL; KENNETH BERNARD; MARK HILL; CODY SMITH; DANIEL GARDNER; ROBERT GOOLSBY; JOHN JUNG; MATTHEW SMITH; JOSH BRUMBAUGH; RYAN HUBERT; WILLIAM DON COOK; HILARY GOODFRIEND; KATHRYN HUMMEL; SCOTT FORMAN; DILLON DRAKE; RAMIN SARTIP, DARREN HONEYCUTT; AHMED ABDI; JAMAR HAYNES; SCOTT WHITEHILL; MATTHEW BROWNLEE; BENJAMIN BISCHOFF, STEPHEN LESZCZYNSKI; CASSANDRA MORRISON; ROBERT RANEY; DAVID POLLEY; MARK NAPIER; KEITH FENCL; MARK ARENDT; HARVEY ANDERSON; ROSALYNDA GARZA; - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Karen Belcher on Apr 21, 2023

Head Comment: Case Title Continued: JEFFREY QUIZHPI; JEFFREY KALOUSTIAN; RONALD CEREMELLO; RANDALL MAINGOT; GEORGE ANDREW RAYNE; ROBERT LOVELL; SAMUEL HUFFMAN v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Court: 6th Circuit Court (Published Opinions)

Attorneys 1: ARGUED: Steve W. Berman, HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP, Seattle, Washington, for Appellants.

Attorneys 2: ARGUED: Stephanie A. Douglas, BUSH SEYFERTH PLLC, Troy, Michigan, for Appellee.

Attorneys 3: ON BRIEF: Steve W. Berman, HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP, Seattle, Washington, E. Powell Miller, Sharon S. Almonrode, Emily E. Hughes, THE MILLER LAW FIRM, Rochester, Michigan, Adam J. Levitt, John E. Tangren, DICELLO LEVITT GUTZLER LLC, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellants.

Attorneys 4: ON BRIEF: Stephanie A. Douglas, BUSH SEYFERTH PLLC, Troy, Michigan, Jill M. Wheaton, Kyle M. Asher, DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC, Ann Arbor, Michigan, for Appellee.

Judge(s): GRIFFIN, BUSH, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges

Court Appealed: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs are a group of consumers alleging that defendant Ford Motor Company intentionally submitted false fuel economy testing figures for certain vehicles to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Plaintiffs claim that this, in turn, led the agency to provide an inaccurate fuel economy estimate to consumers, which induced consumers (including plaintiffs) to buy those vehicles. The district court ruled that federal law preempted plaintiffs’ state-law claims. We agree and affirm.

Attachments: