This is an action for declaratory judgment filed by an inmate to correct his sentence expiration date. The inmate was sentenced to life in prison for first-degree murder, and his sentence was governed by the release eligibility provision now codified in Tennessee Code Annotated § 40-35-501(h)(1). The State agreed that § 40-35-501(h)(1) entitled the inmate to apply credits for good behavior and program performance to reduce his parole eligibility date, but the parties disagreed on whether the inmate could also apply his credits to reduce the length of his sentence, to advance his sentence expiration date. The trial court entered judgment for the inmate. The court reasoned that the sentence credit statute, Tennessee Code Annotated § 41-21-236, applies to all inmates unless otherwise specified and that the General Assembly had not specifically prohibited the application of credits to the expiration date of life sentences for first-degree murder. We agree with the trial court and affirm its judgment.

This is an action for declaratory judgment filed by an inmate to correct his sentence expiration date. The inmate was sentenced to life in prison for first-degree murder, and his sentence was governed by the release eligibility provision in Tennessee Code Annotated § 40-35-501(h)(1). The State agreed that § 40-35-501(h)(1) entitled the inmate to apply credits for good behavior and program performance to reduce his parole eligibility date, but the parties disagreed on whether the inmate could also apply his credits to reduce the length of his sentence, to advance his sentence expiration date. The trial court entered judgment for the inmate. The court reasoned that the sentence credit statute, Tennessee Code Annotated § 41-21-236, applies to all inmates unless otherwise specified and that the General Assembly had not specifically prohibited the application of credits to the expiration date of life sentences for first-degree murder. We agree with the trial court and affirm its judgment.

This is an action for declaratory judgment filed by an inmate to correct his sentence expiration date. The inmate was sentenced to life in prison for first-degree murder, and his sentence was governed by the release eligibility provision in Tennessee Code Annotated § 40-35-501(h)(1). The State agreed that § 40-35-501(h)(1) entitled the inmate to apply credits for good behavior and program performance to reduce his parole eligibility date, but the parties disagreed on whether the inmate could also apply his credits to reduce the length of his sentence, to advance his sentence expiration date. The trial court entered judgment for the inmate. The court reasoned that the sentence credit statute, Tennessee Code Annotated § 41-21-236, applies to all inmates unless otherwise specified and that the General Assembly had not specifically prohibited the application of credits to the expiration date of life sentences for first-degree murder. We agree with the trial court and affirm its judgment.

This is one of four concurrent appeals filed in four separate causes of action, all of which concern the trial court’s decision to grant the employer’s motions for summary judgment and dismiss all four claims. In this claim, the employee alleges an injury to her low back. The employer authorized medical care, and the treating physician released the employee at maximum medical improvement with no permanent impairment and no indication of a need for further medical treatment. The employer also had the employee evaluated by an orthopedic physician, who opined her low back complaints were due to pre-existing conditions and were not primarily caused by her employment. The employer filed a motion for summary judgment, asserting that the employee had no medical proof that her complaints were primarily caused by her employment. The employee did not respond to the motion and did not offer any medical evidence of causation, which is an essential element of her claim, and the trial court granted the motion. The employee has appealed. Having carefully reviewed the record, we affirm the trial court’s order and certify it as final.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Tennessee sent a letter to the town of Mason urging officials to halt all actions related to a planned ICE detention center at a former state prison, the Commercial Appeal reports. The letter alleges the project did not receive the necessary votes to pass. The Mason Board of Aldermen voted on Tuesday on two contracts: one between the town and private prison company CoreCivic, and another between the town and ICE. Mason’s town recorder initially said the second contract failed, but the town attorney later said abstentions had been mistakenly counted. If approved, the project would convert the West Tennessee Detention Center in Mason into an ICE detention facility operated by CoreCivic.

After several months of steady rates, Tennessee’s unemployment rate edged up slightly in July, according to the Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development. The state’s seasonally adjusted jobless rate was 3.6%, an increase of 0.1 percentage point from June. A year ago, the rate was 3.4%. Tennessee’s rate remains below the U.S. rate, which was 4.2% in July, unchanged from a year earlier.

Nashville's Estes Kefauver Federal Building and Annex at 801 Broadway is on a list of government properties approved for closure and divestment this year, The Tennessean reports. Named for Tennessee politician Estes Kefauver, the building served as a courthouse for the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee until 2021. The federal government plans to sell the property, and remaining federal tenants will vacate. Officials say the sale could save $484 million. A timeline for the transaction has not been announced.

Hamilton County Criminal Court Clerk Vince Dean is warning the public about a bond scam targeting family members of inmates. Dean said scammers are contacting relatives, often claiming to represent established local bonding companies, and requesting payment to post an inmate’s bond, The Chattanoogan reports. In one reported case, a family paid the requested amount after receiving a message from someone using a fake bondsman’s name, but no such person exists on the county’s bond list. “Everyone should use extreme caution when making bonds for family and friends,” Dean said, noting that it is against state law to solicit a bond. He advised verifying any bonding agent by asking to see their Tennessee Association of Professional Bail Agents card, which includes a photo and expiration date.

A U.S. District Court judge has ruled in favor of dozens of local governments and agencies, including Nashville, that sued several Trump administration officials and federal agencies in May, alleging they were imposing political conditions on grant funds already appropriated by Congress. On Tuesday, Senior U.S. District Judge Barbara Rothstein issued a preliminary injunction in the case, halting nearly a dozen agencies from withholding billions in federal grants if those cities did not implement the Trump administration’s policy agenda, such as prohibiting the use of funds to promote gender ideology, illegal immigration, or diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, according to The Tennessean. Nashville joined the case in May, with roughly $23 million in U.S. Department of Transportation funding and nearly $290,000 in housing grants under threat. This is the third lawsuit Nashville has joined against the Trump administration this year over grant funding.

A joint operation between the Tennessee Highway Patrol (THP) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in South Nashville is facing new scrutiny over concerns by some lawmakers that Hispanic drivers were disproportionately targeted during traffic stops conducted in May. According to WSMV, partial dispatch records obtained by the news station identified the ethnicity of 34 drivers, 29 of whom were Hispanic, two were Asian, two were Black and one was white. The state has not released full data on the 369 stops conducted. Rep. John Ray Clemmons, D-Nashville said the lack of transparency raises legal and constitutional concerns, while U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has denied any racial profiling, saying all enforcement operations are based on investigative work. The Department of Public Safety says it will work on producing “responsive records.”