One hundred years ago, the trial in The State of Tennessee v. John T. Scopes began with jury selection in Dayton, putting the tiny town between Knoxville and Chattanooga in the national spotlight. From July 10 until July 21, the "Scopes Monkey Trial," as it came to be known, tested the constitutionality of the state's Butler Act, which prohibited teaching evolution in public school science classes. Reflections on the trial include Russell Fowler's "History's Verdict" column in the July/August issue of the Tennessee Bar Journal, which looks back on the trial and its aftermath. A joint reporting project from the Nashville Banner and Nashville Scene considers how the case still resonates in today's legal and political landscape. Knox News takes a tour of the historic Rhea County courthouse and its Scopes museum, which preserves the historical facts of the trial. And the Tennessee State Museum presents "Eight Days in Dayton: 100 Years of the Scopes Trial" through Oct. 12, an exhibit featuring significant artifacts related to the trial.

In this month’s episode of BarBuzz, TBA staff sit down with Brant Harrell, Zac Oswald, Kyle Stack and Anne-Louise Wirthlin to dive deeper into “Access to Justice in the Age of AI,” the cover story in the May/June Tennessee Bar Journal. Each guest contributed insights and experiences for the article, including how they’re using technology — from AI tools to the Justice Bus — to expand legal access, bridge rural gaps and keep client data secure. Join TBA’s Communications Coordinator Azya Thornton and Access to Justice Director Liz Slagle Todaro for the July podcast to learn more. Missed a past episode? Check them out in the BarBuzz archive.

In this month’s episode of BarBuzz, TBA staff sit down with Brant Harrell, Zac Oswald, Kyle Stack and Anne-Louise Wirthlin to dive deeper into “Access to Justice in the Age of AI,” the cover story in the May/June Tennessee Bar Journal. Each guest contributed insights and experiences for the article, including how they’re using technology — from AI tools to the Justice Bus — to expand legal access, bridge rural gaps and keep client data secure. Join TBA’s Communications Coordinator Azya Thornton and Access to Justice Director Liz Slagle Todaro for the July podcast to learn more. Missed a past episode? Check them out in the BarBuzz archive.

The 2025 Elder Law Forum will be held next Friday at Belmont University College of Law’s Randall & Sadie Baskin Center in Nashville. This annual event brings together attorneys and elder care professionals from across Tennessee to explore key topics including undue influence, Medicaid/TennCare, VA benefits and ethics. Lunch and free parking is included. The forum offers a valuable opportunity for learning and networking within the elder law community. For more information and to register, visit the TBA website.

Shana Singleton, a law student at Lincoln Memorial University Duncan School of Law and a graduate of the TBA Young Lawyers Division's 2025 DLI Class, recently was recognized as a recipient of the Napier-Looby Bar Association's (NBLA) 2025 Scholarship for Public Service. NBLA is an affiliate chapter of the National Bar Association based in Nashville. Singleton is a military veteran and is interning at the Nashville District Attorney's Office this summer. See a photo from the event.

Defendant, Paul Springer, was charged with two counts of forgery in an amount $60,000 or more but less than $250,000 and one count of theft in an amount $60,000 or more but less than $250,000.1 Defendant’s jury trial ended in a mistrial after Defendant “violat[ed] a court order” by referencing an alleged victim’s prior criminal record. During the trial, Defendant was twice held in contempt of court, once for arriving late to court and again for violating the court’s order. Nearly three years after judgments were entered against Defendant for two counts of direct contempt of court, Defendant filed a “Motion to Dismiss Contempt of Court,” which the trial court denied.2 Defendant appeals, arguing the evidence was insufficient to support a finding of contempt. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to hear Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

Davidson County lawyer Mitchell Ray Miller received a public censure from the Tennessee Supreme Court on July 14. The court found that Miller violated Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3 and 1.4 when he failed to respond to four communications from a client over the course of a month. The client had paid a fee of $2,996.50 to hire Miller to probate an estate. The client met with Miller, but Miller never filed the petition to probate the estate. The client ultimately hired new counsel. In addition to imposing the censure, the court directed Miller to make restitution to the client in the amount of $2,996.50.

After the Defendant, Brandon Tylor Mulac, was arrested in Smith County with 396 grams of methamphetamine in his vehicle, law enforcement executed a search warrant on his home in DeKalb County and found another 425 grams of methamphetamine. The Defendant subsequently filed a motion to suppress the evidence from the DeKalb County search and a motion to exclude evidence from his Smith County arrest based on Rule 404(b) of the Tennessee Rules of Evidence, both of which were denied by the trial court. Following a jury trial, the Defendant was convicted of possession with intent to sell or deliver over three hundred grams of methamphetamine and received a sentence of sixty years’ imprisonment. In this appeal, the Defendant argues the trial court erred based on the following three grounds: (1) in denying his motions to suppress because the search warrant and affidavit did not establish probable cause and because the affidavit contained false information in violation of Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978); (2) in admitting evidence from the Smith County traffic stop in violation of Rule 404(b); and (3) in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because the evidence was insufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction.1 Upon review, we affirm.

The Petitioner, Robert Wayne Garner, appeals the summary dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. Specifically, the Petitioner argues that he is entitled to habeas corpus relief because the trial court failed to explicitly order he serve his life sentence for felony murder in the Tennessee Department of Correction (“TDOC”) and failed to indicate the same on his felony murder judgment form. Additionally, the Petitioner alleges two procedural errors occurred in these proceedings: (1) the State was without authority to attach a proposed dismissal order to its motion to dismiss the habeas corpus petition, and (2) the habeas corpus court erred by simply signing the State’s dismissal order without providing extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law for its decision. After review, we affirm.

Lamar Fletcher, Defendant, appeals the summary dismissal of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1. After review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.