Three University of Tennessee at Knoxville students and one former student working on campus are at risk of deportation due to changes made by the federal government to their immigration status, according to an email Chancellor Donde Plowman sent Friday to the campus community. The university discovered the changes in a federal immigration database that processes documents for international students and exchange visitors, Knox News reports. The status change occurred after the students were identified in a criminal records check, making them ineligible to be enrolled or employed at the school and placing them at risk of deportation. UT found one student had been granted judicial diversion for a property crime, and another had been charged with DUI. The university has not determined the cause of the status change for the other two individuals. "The Center for Global Engagement’s International Student and Scholar Services is working to support these individuals as we continue to work to fully understand their situations," Plowman said in the email.

The U.S. Copyright Office has released Part 2 of its Report on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence (AI), addressing the copyrightability of AI-generated works. The report maintains that human authorship and creativity remain essential to obtaining copyright protection for works involving materials created by artificial intelligence. Part 1, released last summer, discusses legal and policy issues related to AI and digital replicas, while Part 2 analyzes the type and degree of human contributions needed to bring AI-generated works under U.S. copyright protection. The report also explores how other countries are approaching the copyrightability of AI-generated content and the policy implications of providing additional legal protection for such material, Reuters reports. The office's AI initiative, launched in 2023, aims to issue registration guidance for works incorporating AI-generated content.

Last week, Gov. Bill Lee and other officials toured areas in Selmer hit by tornadoes and flooding that devastated countless homes, News Channel 9 reports. Lee declared a state of emergency Wednesday in anticipation of the storm, and President Donald Trump issued an emergency declaration for federal funding to provide aid. "There are confirmations of deaths across the state, but we also know there are potential other deaths that have not been confirmed ... It's too early to know," Lee said. As of Saturday, the Tennessee Department of Health confirmed 10 weather-related deaths, and nearly 62,000 people were without power in Middle Tennessee, the Tennessean reports. Read more from the governor's office.

Use Tennessee Bar Association membership to fulfill your Tennessee CLE requirements while staying updated on state law, legislation and legal developments. The TBA delivers updates on your practice area, legal news and significant court opinions directly to you. Customize your membership by joining any of our 33 specialized sections designed to enhance your expertise, expand your network in Tennessee and advance your legal career. Start your membership here.

The Tennessee Department of Treasury’s Criminal Injuries Compensation Program has provided more than $350 million in assistance to victims of violent crime since its inception in 1982. Financial aid has helped cover expenses such as medical bills, lost wages and mental health counseling. As part of National Crime Victims' Rights Week, which runs April 21-27, the program is joining organizations across the country to raise awareness of victims' rights, inspire communities and address unmet needs. State Treasurer David H. Lillard Jr. said in a press release that the office aims to increase awareness of online training resources to financially assist victims of crime. Tennesseans are encouraged to review the criminal injuries training available on the department's website.

CLAY, Circuit Judge. Environmental groups Sierra Club and Appalachian Voices (collectively, “Petitioners”) petition for review of Respondent Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation’s (“TDEC”) order issuing a water quality certification to Intervenor-Respondent Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (“TGP”) pursuant to § 401 of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1341(a), for TGP’s proposed Cumberland Pipeline (the “Pipeline”). For the reasons set forth below, we DENY the petition for review.

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. This case asks us to resolve whether Plaintiffs may bring state-law claims in state court based on a bribery scheme between one of the nation’s largest unions and one of the largest auto manufacturers (which resulted in multiple, federal criminal indictments) or whether the claims must be heard in federal court. We hold that such claims must be heard in federal court because Congress has completely preempted any claims based on the rights created by the collective bargaining agreement. Plaintiffs are thirty-eight current and former engineers employed by Defendant FCA US LLC (“FCA”), the successor corporation to Chrysler Group, LLC. Plaintiffs are and were members of International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (“UAW”), the union representing engineering employees of FCA. Once the massive bribery scheme was made public, Plaintiffs pursued workplace grievances alleging that FCA officials had paid bribes to UAW officials to transfer Plaintiffs’ workplaces in violation of the collective bargaining agreement. These grievances were denied, and a previous panel of this court held that federal claims based on these grievances were time-barred. While Plaintiffs pursued their federal claims in federal court, they also filed a complaint in state court asserting state common-law claims. Following removal of the state-court action to federal court, the district court denied Plaintiffs’ motion for remand, and the parties stipulated to dismissal. For the reasons explained below, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment and order denying Plaintiffs’ motion for remand.

CLAY, Circuit Judge. Appalachian Voices and Sierra Club (collectively “Petitioners”) petition for review of Respondent United States Army Corps of Engineers’ (the “Corps”) decision to issue a permit to Intervenor-Respondent Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (“TGP”) pursuant to § 404 of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1344, for TGP’s proposed Cumberland Pipeline (the “Pipeline”). Petitioners, environmental groups with members who live nearby or utilize areas within the Pipeline’s proposed path, seek to vacate the § 404 permit, arguing that the Corps violated the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq., in approving TGP’s permit application. For the reasons set forth below, we DENY the petition for review.

The Defendant, Robert Oliver, was convicted by a Washington County jury of aggravated rape and aggravated assault, for which he received an effective sentence of twenty-eight years' incarceration. On appeal, the Defendant argues that (1) the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient ot support his conviction of aggravated rape, (2) the State commited prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments, and (3) the trial court erred by ordering the Defendant ot pay $60,000 ni fines. Following our review, we conclude that the trial court failed to make appropriate findings regarding its imposition of fines. Therefore, we reverse the trial court's sentencing determination regarding the fines and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We otherwise affirm the judgments of the trial court.

The Johnson County Grand Jury charged the Defendant, Leigh Katherine Littleton, and two codefendants by presentment with first degree felony murder, especially aggravated kidnapping, conspiracy to commit especially aggravated kidnapping, extortion, conspiracy to commit extortion, and aggravated assault. Following trial, a jury convicted the Defendant of first degree felony murder, especially aggravated kidnapping, conspiracy to commit especially aggravated kidnapping, extortion, and conspiracy to commit extortion, and the trial court imposed an effective life sentence. On appeal, the Defendant argues (1) the evidence is insufficient to sustain her convictions; (2) the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress her first statement; (3) the trial court erred in allowing her character to be defamed; (4) the trial court improperly excluded a pre-trial plea offer; and (5) the trial court imposed an unconstitutional condition on her right to present a defense by not allowing her to present proof of her codefendants’ criminal histories. After review, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.