TBA President Ed Lanquist Jr. was joined by Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) General Counsel John Coke and Indigent Services Team Lead Attorney Joe Byrd for a conversation about the indigent representation proposal from the AOC on behalf of the Tennessee Supreme Court. The proposal includes a new structure for handling civil appointments and criminal conflicts for clients who are indigent. Under the plan, the Tennessee Supreme Court would establish an “Office of Indigent Conflicts and Civil Counsel,” with oversight by an “Indigent Representation Commission.” The interview directly addresses questions posed by Tennessee attorneys, including those who currently take appointed cases. Among the topics discussed are how, if funded, the program would be implemented and the opportunity to work closely with stakeholders, including local attorneys. Learn more about the plan and indigent representation in Tennessee and watch for our ongoing coverage of this issue.

The Tennessee Alliance for Legal Services (TALS) is seeking session proposals for this year's Equal Justice University (EJU), set for Aug. 27-29 in Murfreesboro. Topics of interest include employment law, family law, health and benefits, housing and consumer, special education and juvenile justice, as well as professionalism and techology. See all topics and submit proposals online by April 18.

The Tennessee Supreme Court has directed Dale Gerard Nowicki to respond within 30 days why discipline imposed in the state of California should not also be imposed in Tennessee. On Jan. 6, the California Supreme Court imposed two years of probation on Nowicki. The Tennessee court noted in its order that if Nowicki does not respond by the deadline, it will impose discipline "with identical terms and conditions" than what was imposed in California.

THAPAR, Circuit Judge. In 1979, Karu Gene White used a crowbar to beat a blind seventy-five-year-old and two other seniors to death while robbing them. In the forty-five years since, White has offered various reasons why he shouldn’t be executed. Here, he argues that Kentucky shouldn’t have sentenced him to death because his trial counsel failed to investigate and present mitigating evidence. Neither argument holds up. Thus, we affirm the district court’s denial of his habeas petition.

The Defendant, Jarrod Dewayne Moore, appeals the Henderson County Circuit Court’s imposition of an effective ten-year sentence in confinement for his drug and firearm-related convictions, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his request for probation. Based on our review, we affirm the sentencing determinations of the trial court.

The Petitioner, Alonzo Hoskins, appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief challenging his 2019 convictions for felony murder and especially aggravated robbery. The Petitioner argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel due ot trial counsel's failure to request a post-trial inquiry into a juror who had expressed difficulty hearing portions of the trial. The State counters that the post-conviction court correctly denied relief. Based on our review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.

This is an accelerated interlocutory appeal as of right filed pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 10B. Due to numerous deficiencies in the petition, the appeal is hereby dismissed.

This appeal arises out of a petition filed by Roger and Regina Judd (collectively, “Appellants”) seeking grandparent visitation with three minor children, Appellants’ grandchildren. Kaylee and Spencer Powell (collectively, “Appellees”) filed their answer to the petition, claiming that Appellants lacked standing to bring their request. The Putnam County Juvenile Court (“juvenile court”) dismissed Appellants’ petition for failure to state a claim based on lack of standing. Discerning no error, we affirm.

The employee filed a notice of appeal in Spanish purportedly seeking to appeal the trial court’s denial of her motion to continue a summary judgment hearing. Despite having been instructed that the notice of appeal must be in English and having been provided resources to assist with obtaining the translation, the employee failed to file anything further. Accordingly, we are unable to discern any issues or argument on appeal, and the appeal is therefore dismissed. The case is remanded to the trial court.

TBA’s Legislative Updates podcast features TBA attorneys and lobbyists Berkley Schwarz of Pier Strategies LLC, and Brad Lampley and Ashley Harbin of Adams and Reese. In the most recent episode, they discuss several key legislative topics, including SB1052/HB1355, which amends TCA §36-1-102(45)(B) to specify that a biological father who only pays token support will not qualify as a putative father; SB540/HB492, related to custody determinations and child support; SB541/HB906, legislation from the TBA probate study group and its amendment; SB394/HB569, which deals with selecting a settlement agent in real property transactions; SB943/HB1255, which focuses on continuing education for judges involved in child custody cases; and TBA's Day on the Hill. Tune in to the podcast on the TBA website or through this link. And don’t forget to register for TBA's Day on the Hill and the Big Shrimp Reception next week.